Automated Screening of Emergency Department Notes for Drug-Associated Bleeding Adverse Events Occurring in Older Adults
Boyce RD, Jao J, Miller T, Kane-Gill SL. Automated Screening of Emergency Department Notes for Drug-Associated Bleeding Adverse Events Occurring in Older Adults. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Oct; 8(4):1022-1030. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2017-02-RA-0036. Epub 2017 Dec 14. PMID: 29241242.
Objective To conduct research to show the value of text mining for automatically identifying suspected bleeding adverse drug events (ADEs) in the emergency depart-ment (ED).
Methods A corpus of ED admission notes was manually annotated for bleeding ADEs. The notes were taken for patients ≥ 65 years of age who had an ICD-9 code for bleeding, the presence of hemoglobin value ≤ 8 g/dL, or were transfused > 2 units of packed red blood cells. This training corpus was used to develop bleeding ADE algorithms using Random Forest and Classiﬁcation and Regression Tree (CART). A completely separate set of notes was annotated and used to test the classiﬁcation performance of the ﬁnal models using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC).
Results The best performing CART resulted in an AUROC on the training set of 0.882. The model’s AUROC on the test set was 0.827. At a sensitivity of 0.679, the model had a speciﬁcity of 0.908 and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.814. It had a relatively simple and intuitive structure consisting of 13 decision nodes and 14 leaf nodes. Decision path probabilities ranged from 0.041 to 1.0. The AUROC for the best performing Random Forest method on the training set was 0.917. On the test set, the model’s AUROC was 0.859. At a sensitivity of 0.274, the model had a speciﬁcity of 0.986 and a PPV of 0.92.
Conclusion Both models accurately identify bleeding ADEs using the presence or absence of certain clinical concepts in ED admission notes for older adult patients. The CART model is particularly noteworthy because it does not require signiﬁcant technical overhead to implement. Future work should seek to replicate the results on a larger test set pulled from another institution.